Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorCerci, Mehmet Halis
dc.contributor.authorYilmaz, Ali Kerim
dc.contributor.authorKehribar, Lokman
dc.contributor.authorSurucu, Serkan
dc.contributor.authorAydin, Mahmud
dc.contributor.authorMahirogullari, Mahir
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-28T11:37:42Z
dc.date.available2023-07-28T11:37:42Z
dc.date.issued2023en_US
dc.identifier.citationCerci, M. H., Yilmaz, A. K., Kehribar, L., Surucu, S., Aydin, M., & Mahirogullari, M. (2023). Evaluation of Isokinetic Knee Strengths after ACL Reconstruction with Quadrupled Semitendinosus Suspensory Femoral and Tibial Fixation versus Four-Strand Semitendinosus and Gracilis Suspensory Femoral and Tibial Screw Fixation. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 12(12), 4004.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2077-0383
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12124004
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12294/3916
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: The purpose of this study was to demonstrate that patients undergoing ACL reconstruction with quadrupled semitendinosus suspensory femoral and tibial fixation have comparable results in muscle strength and knee function to those undergoing ACL reconstruction with four-strand semitendinosus-gracilis suspensory femoral fixation and a bioabsorbable tibial interference screw fixation. Materials and Methods: Between 2017 and 2019, 64 patients who were operated on by the same surgeon were included. Patients underwent ACL reconstruction technique with quadrupled semitendinosus suspensory femoral and tibial button fixation in Group 1, and patients underwent ACL reconstruction with coupled four-strand semitendinosus-gracilis suspensory femoral fixation and a bioabsorbable tibial interference screw in Group 2. Evaluation of patients was performed with the Lysholm and Tegner activity scale preoperatively and at the 1st and 6th months postoperatively. At the 6-month visit, isokinetic testing of the operated and non-operated limbs was performed in both groups. Results: There was no significant difference in the age, weight, and BMI values of the patients in Groups 1 and 2 (p < 0.05). According to the strength values of the operated sides of the patients in Group 1 and Group 2, there was no significant difference in the angular velocities of 60 & DEG; s(-1), 180 & DEG; s(-1,) and 240 & DEG; s(-1) in both extension and flexion phases between the operated sides of Groups 1 and 2 (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Patients who have ACL reconstruction with quadrupled semitendinosus suspensory femoral and tibial fixation have comparable muscle strength and knee function to those who undergo ACL reconstruction with four-strand semitendinosus-gracilis suspensory femoral fixation and a bioabsorbable tibial interference screw.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMDPIen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINEen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/jcm12124004en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectACL reconstructionen_US
dc.subjectcortical suspensory fixationen_US
dc.subjectinterference screwen_US
dc.subjectisokinetic strengthen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of Isokinetic Knee Strengths after ACL Reconstruction with Quadrupled Semitendinosus Suspensory Femoral and Tibial Fixation versus Four-Strand Semitendinosus and Gracilis Suspensory Femoral and Tibial Screw Fixationen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.departmentTıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümüen_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-4083-3619en_US
dc.identifier.volume12en_US
dc.identifier.issue12en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.institutionauthorCerci, Mehmet Halis
dc.authorwosidEPP-8740-2022en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001015033900001en_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster