Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorYıldız, İzlem Gözükara
dc.contributor.authorBuruk, Pelin
dc.contributor.authorŞimşek, Ömer Faruk
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-24T08:10:16Z
dc.date.available2023-05-24T08:10:16Z
dc.date.issued2023en_US
dc.identifier.citationYıldız, İ. G., Buruk, P., & Şimşek, Ö. F. (2023). Six Blind Men and an Elephant: Workaholism vs. Work-Engagement from the Big-Two Personality Perspective rather than the Big Five. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 15(1), 549-560.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1309-0712
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.20491/isarder.2023.1603
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12294/3868
dc.description.abstractPurpose – This study attempts to compare and contrast workaholism and work engagement in terms of their dispositional antecedents. Although both concepts are perceived as heavy work investment, workaholism is associated with negative consequences such as burnout, counterproductive behavior, work-family conflict, psychosomatic symptoms, and declining work performance. Work engagement, on the other hand, is associated with positive aspects that include superior performance, organizational commitment, organizational citizenship behavior, physical and mental health. To distinguish a workaholic from a work engaged employee, this study offers a bird’s eye view using the Big Two, the higher order traits of the Big Five. Design/Methodology/Approach – The study is conducted on a sample of 250 full-time teachers (male: 154, female: 96; mean age:33.38 years) who were working at a higher education institution or a K-12 school in Istanbul, Turkey. The response rate was 90.9%. The convenience sampling method was used in data collection procedures. The data obtained by the survey method were analyzed using the structural equation modeling and common method variance techniques. Finding – According to the results, stability was positively and significantly correlated with work engagement but negatively and significantly correlated with workaholism. Plasticity, on the other hand, was correlated strongly and positively with workaholism yet had no statistically significant correlation with work engagement. The negative and weak correlation between Stability and workaholism became a stronger path in the structural regression model, indicating the presence of a suppressor effect. Discussion – The results of this research reveal that if an organization prefers work engaged employees rather than workaholics, then during the selection process, the hiring decision makers should look for the trait Stability as well.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMelih Topaloğluen_US
dc.relation.ispartofİşletme Araştırmaları Dergisien_US
dc.identifier.doi10.20491/isarder.2023.1603en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectWorkaholismen_US
dc.subjectWork Engagementen_US
dc.subjectBig Twoen_US
dc.subjectStabilityen_US
dc.subjectPlasticityen_US
dc.subjectSuppressor Effecten_US
dc.titleSix Blind Men and an Elephant: Workaholism vs. Work-Engagement from the Big-Two Personality Perspective rather than the Big Fiveen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.departmentİktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi, İşletme Bölümüen_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-2466-2362en_US
dc.identifier.volume15en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage549en_US
dc.identifier.endpage560en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.institutionauthorYıldız, İzlem Gözükara


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster