Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorKotil, Kadiren_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-07T11:35:05Z
dc.date.available2019-08-07T11:35:05Z
dc.date.issued2016en_US
dc.identifier.citationKotil, K. (2016). Closed Drainage versus Non-Drainage for Single-Level Lumbar Disc Surgery: Relationship between Epidural Hematoma and Fibrosis. Asian Spine Journal, 10(6), 1072-1078. doi:10.4184/asj.2016.10.6.1072en_US
dc.identifier.issn1976-1902
dc.identifier.issn1976-7846
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12294/1624
dc.descriptionKotil, Kadir (Arel Author)en_US
dc.description.abstractStudy Design: A prospective clinical series with prospectively collected data. Purpose: The efficacy of using closed suction drains (CSD) after single-level lumbar disc surgery was evaluated. Postoperative CSD are regularly fitted to prevent postoperative epidural hematomas (EH) after multilevel lumbar decompression, although it remains unclear whether CSD also reduces postoperative EH following single-level lumbar disc surgery. Overview of Literature: Few articles have addressed the clinical outcome in patients with single-level lumbar disc disease who were treated by two different operative methods (with and without drainage). Methods: Between 2012 and 2014, 115 patients with a single level discectomy underwent two surgical procedures: with CSD (group A, 60 cases) and without CSD (group B, 55 cases). There were no significant differences in age, sex, segment level, herniation type, or disease duration between the groups. Wound infection, EH, and epidural fibrosis (EF) were evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging. Pain intensity was evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI). Reduction in analgesic treatment and patient satisfaction were also recorded. Results: The overall rate of postoperative EH was 5% and 16.3% in group A and B, respectively, whereas the rate of postoperative EF was 11.6% in group A and 21.8% in group B. The postoperative VAS score was 0.32 (standard deviation [SD], 0.45) for group A and 2.62 (SD, 06.9) for group B, whereas ODI was 9.11 (SD, 0.68) and 8.23 (SD, 0.78) for group A and and group B, respectively, with no significant differences observed. Conclusions: In patients operated on by unilateral, single-level lumbar disc surgery, the use of suction CSD into the operation site results in lower levels of EH and EF radiologically, thereby providing a better clinical outcome.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherKorean Soc Spine Surgeryen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAsian Spine Journalen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.4184/asj.2016.10.6.1072en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.4184/asj.2016.10.6.1072
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectSpineen_US
dc.subjectHematomaen_US
dc.subjectFibrosisen_US
dc.subjectDrainageen_US
dc.subjectBack Painen_US
dc.titleClosed Drainage versus Non-Drainage for Single-Level Lumbar Disc Surgery: Relationship between Epidural Hematoma and Fibrosisen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.departmentSağlık Bilimleri Yüksekokulu, Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Bölümüen_US
dc.identifier.volume10en_US
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1072en_US
dc.identifier.endpage1078en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.institutionauthorKotil, Kadiren_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Aksi belirtilmediği sürece bu öğenin lisansı: info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess