Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorMenengic, Kubra Nuren_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-22T13:36:25Z
dc.date.available2022-08-22T13:36:25Z
dc.date.issued2022en_US
dc.identifier.citationOvacik, U., Tarakci, E., Gungor, F., Menengic, K. N., Leblebici, G., Acar, Z. O., & Soysal, A. (2022). The minnesota manual dexterity test as a bimanual performance measure in people with multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders, 64 doi:10.1016/j.msard.2022.103943en_US
dc.identifier.issn2211-0348
dc.identifier.urihttps://10.1016/j.msard.2022.103943
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12294/3015
dc.description.abstractBackground: Increasing knowledge about unilateral or bilateral upper limb (UL) involvement in multiple sclerosis (MS) has revealed the need for an objective assessment tool. Objective: The aims of our study were to evaluate manual dexterity using Minnesota Manual Dexterity Test (MMDT) in people with MS (pwMS), to investigate the validity and feasibility of MMDT, and to examine its relationship with other variables. Methods: Eighty pwMS and forty healthy controls were enrolled. Demographic and clinical characteristics of pwMS were recorded, and manual dexterity, activity performance of the UL, hand grip and pinch strength, and fatigue levels were evaluated. Validity was performed using the Nine Hole Peg Test (NHPT). Feasibility was evaluated with questions directed to pwMS. The relationship between MMDT and strength, ABILHAND, fatigue, Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) and disease duration was examined and multiple regression analysis was established. Results: For the MMDT of pwMS were mean placing-dominant 82.73 s, mean placing-nondominant 88.6 s, and mean two-hand turning and placing 61.75 s. All results were statistically significantly different compared to healthy controls. There was moderate to high correlation between the subtests of the MMDT and the NHPT. 85–90% positive feedback was received for the feasibility of MMDT. A significant interaction was found between all subtests of MMDT and EDSS, ABILHAND and disease duration in predicting manual dexterity scores. Conclusions: MMDT is a valid and feasible tool for assessing manual dexterity and it can be used as an appropriate outcome measure in researches aiming to evaluate bilateral UL function in pwMS. © 2022en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.ispartofMultiple Sclerosis and Related Disordersen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.msard.2022.103943en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.msard.2022.103943
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectManual Dexterityen_US
dc.subjectMinnesota Manual Dexterity Testen_US
dc.subjectMultiple Sclerosisen_US
dc.subjectOutcome Assessmenten_US
dc.subjectUpper Extremityen_US
dc.titleThe minnesota manual dexterity test as a bimanual performance measure in people with multiple sclerosisen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.departmentSağlık Bilimleri Yüksekokulu, Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Bölümüen_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-1541-1844en_US
dc.identifier.volume64en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.institutionauthorMenengic, Kubra Nuren_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster